[r-t] Opinions sought

Graham John graham at changeringing.co.uk
Fri Jan 25 13:35:48 GMT 2019

On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 at 13:08, Richard Johnston <johnstonrh at rhj.org.uk> wrote:

> "Spliced" is used in normal practice to denote a composition where at
> least some changes of method do not happen at rounds, and in the case
> of peals on 6 or less all the component extents are "spliced" within
> this meaning.

 And this is how the framework defines it.

The current decisions say:

(D)C.2. Peals consisting of extents and/or round blocks shall only be
called Spliced if each extent or round block is spliced.

Reading this there is a sense that its authors thought that ringing 5
extents of spliced and 2 extents in single methods was somehow
cheating, so a peal shouldn't be considered spliced even though most
of it was.


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list