[r-t] Opinions sought

[Ted Steele]

On 26/01/2019 11:42, Don Morrison wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 6:00 AM Ted Steele <bells at tedsteele.plus.com 
> <mailto:bells at tedsteele.plus.com>> wrote:
>  > Consider a multi method block of minor that is longer than 720
>  > changes and so must contain rounds.
> 
> A fine point: that doesn’t follow. If it’s more than 720, but less than 
> 1,440 it doesn’t have to include rounds. Your argument is easily updated 
> to accommodate that detail, of course.

Indeed; let us say instead that it may legitimately contain rounds and 
for the sake of the argument that it does in fact contain rounds.

Ted