[r-t] Triples puzzles

[Bill Purvis]

Perhaps we should define question 0:
     0. define 'good' ??

Bill

On 15/07/2020 14:26, James Ramsbottom wrote:
> I think that's a very sensible question. We don't want Prof. Holroyd 
> to be leading us up the garden path, setting us a puzzle which he 
> knows cannot be solved!
>
> James
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:15 PM Joe Norton 
> <super.joey.norton at gmail.com <mailto:super.joey.norton at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     This might be a silly question but do at least parts 1 and 3
>     definitely have a solution? Or might the answer be no to either/both?
>
>     Thanks,
>     Joe.
>
>     On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 18:00, Alexander E Holroyd
>     <holroyd at math.ubc.ca <mailto:holroyd at math.ubc.ca>> wrote:
>
>         1. Find an extent using only the three place notations 3,5,147.
>         2. Find a good one.
>         3. Find an extent using only the three place notations 1,7,345.
>         4. Find a good one.
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         ringing-theory mailing list
>         ringing-theory at bellringers.org
>         <mailto:ringing-theory at bellringers.org>
>         https://bellringers.org/listinfo/ringing-theory
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     ringing-theory mailing list
>     ringing-theory at bellringers.org <mailto:ringing-theory at bellringers.org>
>     https://bellringers.org/listinfo/ringing-theory
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.org
> https://bellringers.org/listinfo/ringing-theory


-- 
+----------------------------------------+
| Bill Purvis                            |
| email: bill at billp.org                  |
+----------------------------------------+

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.org/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20200715/0ac6d047/attachment.html>