[r-t] Cheeky Little Surprise Minor

[Graham John]

Alan wrote:
> Unless it is buried in the definition of Touch (which it doesn't appear to be) it looks
> as though the Framework doesn't include anything about Truth in the definition of
> a peal? Whilst I understand the aim of the framework is to be descriptive and
> inclusive I'm a little surprised at that omission as I'd have thought most ringers
> would regard Truth as being a fundamental property of a peal just as much as
> being over 5000 changes.

Truth is articulated as a norm for a published performance. If you
included truth in the definition of a peal, you could not say that you
rang a false peal, for example.

Graham