[r-t] Holt's Original for Oxford Bob Triples?
Robert Bennett
rbennett1729 at gmail.com
Sat May 1 06:03:53 BST 2021
5040 Oxford Bob Triples
Robert H Bennett, 2021.
234567
E 546327-2
625734-4
(S 436725-1
EB 256743-1
ES 346725-1)
463257-2
264357-5
732645-3
637245-5
236745-5
362457-2
743625-3
647325-5
256347-1
642735-4
426357-2
324657-5
573624-1
325467-4
423567-5
524367-5
675324-1
376524-5
623457-4
746235-3
247635-5
352647-1
653247-5
726534-3
E 426573-5
264735-2
432576-4
534276-5
235476-5
762435-1
627354-2
326754-5
263547-2
562347-5
365247-5
723654-3
467235-3
354267-2
673254-1
736542-2
537642-5
265374-3
362574-5
563274-5
635742-2
276354-3
372654-5
253467-4
452367-5
repeated, replacing the bracketted calls with a bob at the same lead (-2)
Apart from normal bobs, the other calls used are:
E= 5ths place when the treble is in 3-4 down; S= grandsire single;
EB= E followed by normal bob; ES = E followed by grandsire single.
This peal is an analogue of Holt's Original peal of Grandsire Triples.
Oxford Bob Triples appears (as far as I can see) to have no exact
equivalent of the bob course (BBB) of Grandsire triples, which is
symmetrical and hence reversible.
Using two types of bobs, there is a reversible two lead course:
1234567
2135476
2314567
3241576
3425167
4352617
4536271
5463721
5647312
6574132 E
6751423
7615432 B
7164523
1765432
1674523 x2
=3.1.5.1.7.1.7.1.7.1.5.1.3.1 x2
This course can be singled into a round block containing the rest of the
leads.
Because both the E bobs and the normal B bobs affect 3 bells, there have to
be at least 6 of each kind of bob in this composition.
Because the round block has an even number of leads (358), a two part
composition is possible.
If the two-lead course is left out, a block of 5012 changes is produced. Is
this the longest possible non peal?
RHB
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.org/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20210501/3deca4cd/attachment.html>
More information about the ringing-theory
mailing list