[r-t] A Surprise Maximus method

[Pip Dillistone]

Chris,

This is neat, though not especially musical. Besides the symmetric sections I'm not certain there's anything especially unique about it, though. It's quite easy to produce a large number of double methods all essentially based on Bristol at various stages, though many of them don't meet this constraint. Some more unrung examples:

-5T-14.5T-7T.36.9T.14-58-9T.14.70.16-18.9T-18-1T,1T [m]

-5T-14.5T-58.30.14-70.58.36-9T.30.58-18.9T-18-1T,1T [m]

-5T-14.5T-7T.36-14.9T.58.14.9T-70.16-18.9T-18-1T,1T [m]

-5T-14.5T-5T.36.7T-14.58.9T-16.70.18-18.9T-18-1T,1T [j]

Best wishes,
Pip

> On 5 Aug 2023, at 17:52, Chris Munday <chris at munday.karoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> The following method may be of interest-
> X7TX14.7TX7T.36.149TX149T.58.149TX149T.70.16X16.9TX16X
> HL 1T
> LE 1T =142638507T9E
>  
> c.f. Bristol S Major
> Same symmetry
> Same lead end
> Same size cross-sections
> Symmetrical sections
>  
> Chris Munday
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> ringing-theory mailing list
> ringing-theory at bellringers.org
> https://bellringers.org/listinfo/ringing-theory
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.org/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20230805/9f20e462/attachment.htm>