[r-t] Re: Major Extents

[Andrew Tibbetts]

(must be a multiple of x, y or z)

Hang on, I haven't multiplied yet.

You're all sounding like ringing fundamentalists, quoting the CC Decisions 
as if it were Gospel truth. Maybe Jim Phillips isn't alone in his literal 
reading of decisions from 'on high'...

xtonguestillincheekyz

p.s. back to the theory, bobs only Standard 41 atw, possible in under 21 
extents?

xpsyz

_________________________________________________________________
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today! 
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger