[r-t] Calling Positions

Roddy Horton roddy.horton at blueyonder.co.uk
Mon Oct 16 17:09:11 UTC 2006


I have to confess to agreeing with part of Philip's posting on this. The 
part I agree with being

> I can see no justification for your suggestion.  I think it would cause
> confusion, with conferring any benefit. A calling position such as 7ths
> or 9ths is unambiguous; your system is not.


assuming, that is, that the word 'without' can be substituted for 'with'.

I don't agree with the idea that calling positions signify coursing orders 
at all.

Roddy 







More information about the ringing-theory mailing list