[r-t] Long lengths of Bristol Surprise Major

Don Morrison dfm at ringing.org
Sun Mar 20 19:03:50 UTC 2016


On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Graham John <graham at changeringing.co.uk>
wrote:
> 68544 Bristol Surprise Major
> Composed by Graham A C John

Ooh, I like it. It raises a whole, new, interesting goal for music, too: it
contains nearly all of the good stuff twice!

It also highlights yet another stupidity in the current CC rules: they
proscribe *any* peals of major or above that are longer than an extent, at
least with the most likely definition of "true" in the context in which it
being used in (D)B.3.

And even if that were fixed, it would seem surprising that you can ring a
peal of major that is an extent plus a partial extent, but not one of
triples.



-- 
Don Morrison <dfm at ringing.org>
"[The] desire to establish theories before assembling facts
and to construct the universe before learning how to observe
it...was the error that...from the very beginning retarded the
progress of philosophy."
     -- Condorcet, _Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress
          of the Human Mind_, tr June Barraclough
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://bellringers.net/pipermail/ringing-theory/attachments/20160320/7872d0d4/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the ringing-theory mailing list