[Bell Historians] Fwd: [r-c] Inaccurate, flawed or futile

[Nick Bowden]

I'm afraid I'd have to nominate "Church Bells of Cornwall" compiled by AC
Cannon, 1979 from the books I own. To be fair though it does clearly state
that the information contained in this book can only be as accurate as that
received from its many sources.
NWB

----- Original Message -----
From: John Camp <camp at b...>
To: bellhistorians <bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 6:34 PM
Subject: [Bell Historians] Fwd: [r-c] Inaccurate, flawed or futile


> This is a forwarded message
> From: Charles Botting <charles.botting at l...>
> To: john at c...
> Date: Friday, November 29, 2002, 5:15:40 PM
> Subject: Fw: [r-c] Inaccurate, flawed or futile
>
> ===8<==============Original message text===============
> Hi John
>
> 'what about John Hearn's book produced a few
> years ago (1994?) - "The Rings and Chimes of Buckinghamshire Churches.
> I understand that Chris Pickford has a copy!
>
> I am not on the Historians list so I wonder if you wouldn't mind passing
> this on to Chris Pickford.
>
> Not a patch on Kev Scabs's book though.
>
> TTFN
>
> Charles
>
>
>
> > Chris Pickford has asked on Bell Historians:
> >
> > > would anyone like to make any suggestions regarding the worst - i.e.
> > > least accurate, most flawed or completely futile in concept - bell
> > > publication ever produced?
> >
> > With his agreement, I'm putting this out here as well. Mr. Kev
> > Scabs's book, reviewed in the comic last week, has already been
> > nominated.
> >
>
> ===8<===========End of original message text===========