[Bell Historians] Largest Town without a ring of bells.

Ron Johnston R.Johnston at b...
Mon Sep 23 14:20:06 BST 2002


Message-ID: <EXECMAIL.1020923142006.I at p...>
Priority: NORMAL
X-Mailer: Execmail for Win32 Version 5.0.1 Build (55)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"


Morley?

On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:23:20 +0100 Chris Pickford 
<c.j.pickford at t...> wrote:

> Felixstowe at the moment, I suspect - but bells are going in shortly
> 
> So, where else?
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Mike Chester 
> To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 1:24 PM
> Subject: [Bell Historians] Largest Town without a ring of bells.
> 
> 
> John Greenhough and I were having a discussion over a ringers tea at 
> Mancetter on Saturday as to where is the largest town that does not 
> have a ring of 5 or more. A bit like Mansfield at one time being the 
> largest town without a railway station, I suppose!
> 
> Any ideas? 
> 
> (Perhaps a Ringing Chat question, I know, but they are too interested 
> in blackberries at the moment!)
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
> ADVERTISEMENT
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This message was sent to you via the Bell Historians' Mailing List. To unsubscribe from the list send an email to bellhistorians-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
> 

-------------------
Ron Johnston
School of Geographical Sciences,
University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS
0117 928 9116 (FAX 0117 928 7878)
r.johnston at b...

* This e-mail message was sent with Execmail V5.0 *





More information about the Bell-historians mailing list