[Bell Historians] Elphick on Whitechapel

[matthewhigby at a...]

In a message dated 13/01/2003 11:23:08 GMT Standard Time, djb122 at y... 
writes:


> I do remember that I though the extra treble was a poor match
> to the others, though. 

I disagree, it is a very strange sounding bell, but a very good match for the 
others. As far as the achoustics go, I don't think they have optimised 
anything everything is open to the massive spire above. The light ten are 
probably easier to hear because they're not drowned out by the bigger 
growlers! 

I think they're a good ring, but all that hum would drive me crazy after too 
long!

Matthew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20030113/fea21ed6/attachment.html>