[Bell Historians] Best 10s

jimhedgcock <jameshedgcock@h...> jameshedgcock at h...
Thu Jan 30 19:16:54 GMT 2003


--- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, Ron Johnston <R.Johnston at b...> 
wrote:
>
I am surprised that Ron has considered Oldham to be poor. The bells 
may be disappointing inside because much has been done to make them 
audible in the ringing chamber from the three tier frame. Outside 
they are one of the best twelves that you will hear - but ringing 
them properly is very demanding because of tower movement. I am told 
that Abergavenny oitside are disappointing.


> Oldham?
> 
> 
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 22:09:05 -0000 David Bryant <djb122 at y...> 
> wrote:
> 
> > > But where are Bath Abbey and Wells Cathedral in your list?
> > 
> > Personally, I don't think the Wells bells are too bad as an 
eight, although
> > the trebles of ten are rather nasty. Bath are generally quite 
nasty.
> > 
> > How about the most crap twelve? Taunton must be a leading 
contender for this
> > dubious honour.
> > 
> > David
> > 
> > 
> > This message was sent to you via the Bell Historians' Mailing 
List. To unsubscribe from the list send an email to bellhistorians-
unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to 
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -------------------
> Ron Johnston
> School of Geographical Sciences,
> University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1SS
> 0117 928 9116 (FAX 0117 928 7878)
> r.johnston at b...
> 
> * This e-mail message was sent with Execmail V5.0 *





More information about the Bell-historians mailing list