[Bell Historians] Layout of information

[George Dawson]

charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


> 2) As regards content, as bells are musical instruments I think one=20
> should always comment on their musical quality. I don't mean tuning=20
> figures, these are rather dry and meaningless, I mean qualitative=20
> judgements on the pleasantness of otherwise of the sound (e.g. old-
> style but sweet sounding, rather out of tune especially bell x which=20
> is quite flat, etc. etc.). Very few writers include this information,=20
> but after all isn't it what a bell is for?
Not all of us have the ear that Chris Dalton & Bill have!

GAD
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20030910/f01c62f4/attachment.html>