[Bell Historians] CCC

[David Bryant]

> I know it would add to bureacracy, but is there a case for two lists ; one
> of bells that all would agree should be listed, the other of bells that
> 'well, could be listed, but....', and which might be listed on a 'better
> safe than sorry' policy.

I can't see any point at all in that. I think it needs to be rememered that
the lists are advisory only - they carry no legal weight with statutory
responsibilities unlike, for example, listings of buildings.

David