[Bell Historians] Debate about bell preservation
david at b...
Sun Apr 4 16:00:13 BST 2004
> Isn't this comment patronising? Don't assume that because you have a
> specialist archaeological interest that others' views aren't just as
> valid. The RW's comments were written mainly by the founders. The
> founders are in regular contact with the CCC and EH. More so than any of
I'm not assuming that others' views aren't valid; I'm merely pointing out
that whatever view anyone holds they need to give the reasons.
More information about the Bell-historians