[Bell Historians] Flat Crowns
jimhedgcock
jameshedgcock at h...
Tue Jan 13 23:20:23 GMT 2004
---
Was there any point other than for cosmetic purposes?
In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "Chris Povey" <cmpovey at 3...> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > Yes! - see attached photo of the second at Pebworth, cast in
2002.
> >
> > That looks like a Doncaster Head to me!
> >
> > David
> >
>
> That's precisely what it is, because that is what Whitechapel said
it would
> provide. The other 2002-cast bell (the treble of the 10) has the
same, as do
> the two 1995-cast bells (the present 3rd & 4th bells). The photo
also
> answers Bill's question about the type of stock on which the new
bells are
> hung. Although the stock in the photo looks exactly like a
Whitechapel one,
> but isn't. When
> the 1995 bells went in, the idea was to match the 'up-and-over'
Whitechapel
> stocks on all the 6 bells hung/rehung by Whites in 1986.
Unfortunately,
> Whitechapel had stopped making this style of stock a few years
previously
> and wouldn't provide more. Hayward Mills had two stocks fabricated
to the
> Whitechapel pattern; and later did the same for the 2002 bells.
>
> Chris Povey
>
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> > To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/bellhistorians/
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > bellhistorians-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list