[Bell Historians] CCC and ringers' accountability

[jimhedgcock]

--- Could those of us 'not in the know' have it explained to us why 
ringing and its progress is being prevented at Bedford?

In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "Arcubus" <markregan at a...> wrote:
> No David
> 
> The circumstances are very very similar. I'm a DAC advisor to help
> ringers and churches - not to prevent ringing and its progress.
> 
> Mark
> 
> Mark Regan
> Arcubus
> 64 London Road
> Worcester
> WR5 2DY
> 0797 1573688 
> www.arcubus.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Bryant [mailto:david at b...] 
> Sent: 15 May 2004 17:03
> To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] CCC and ringers' accountability
> 
> 
> Irrespective of the rights or wrongs of your points, I don't think 
that
> this approach will be at all productive. It will just annoy and 
alienate
> people. I also don't think it's right to make the comparisons with
> ringing which you have, as the circumstances are vastly different.
> 
> > We're only talking about bells and old bits of wood and metal 
here 
> > after
> all.
> 
> If that is your view then why have you accepted the post of bells
> adviser to a DAC?
> 
> David
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.682 / Virus Database: 444 - Release Date: 11/05/2004
> 
> 
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.682 / Virus Database: 444 - Release Date: 11/05/2004