[Bell Historians] Adjustable gudgeons
davidbryant at h...
Tue Feb 15 18:53:37 GMT 2005
>Ah - a headstock that doesn't move.
>- Is a deadstock always the same shape as a (non-tucked-up)
>headstock would be?
They are usually straight, yes.
>- Does this term also encompass the part of the frame of a chime or
>carillon from which a single bell is suspended?
I would have said so. In a modern carillon or chime, it is quite usual for a
number of bells to be suspended from a single deadstock. These are usually
made of two sections of steel channel placed back-to-back with a space in
between, and steel plates top and bottom.
>Before welded steel headstocks enabled greater flexibility of design,
>modification of the period of swing of a bell was more difficult than
>it now is.
In this country, cast iron headstocks have generally been more popular than
steel, particularly in the early days of metal headstocks. The concept of a
slow-swinging bell in the English sense is a result of them, although a
similar result has been achieved elsewhere by adding a heavy counterweight
above the top of a timber headstock.
>The opposite extreme of bell-hanging is founding in Germany. (Is it
>only a coincidence that Germany is also on the opposite side of
>England from America, geographically speaking?) There the
>non-tucked-up headstock is preferred for fast free swinging, which
>produces a distinctly different "music" from that of an equivalent
>set of free-swinging bells hung American-style.
Taylor's hung a few single heavy full-circle ringing bells like this in the
early C20 - examples which spring to mind are Rugby school chapel (since
rehung on an arched slow-swinging headstock, and the bass bell of Cobh
carillon (since rehung dead). In both cases, it appears that these bells
were designed to be rung with a falling clapper in the German fashion. Both
bells (with their fittings) are shown in contemporary Taylor photographs in
my article on heavy single bells hung for ringing at
More information about the Bell-historians