[Bell Historians] Lea Marston

[Richard Offen]

--- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "David Bryant" 
<davidbryant at h...> wrote:
> >Wouldn't "non-diatonic ring" be an easier description for
> >publications such as Dove?
> 
> No, because that tells you bugger all apart from the fact that it 
isn't 
> major! Far better to describe what it actually is.
> 
> David

Be honest David, apart from pedants like us, who's really 
interested? All most ringers want to know is 'are they ringable?' 
and 'about how much does the tenor weigh?'!

Richard