[Bell Historians] Pitches of bells
Andrew Higson
andrew_higson at ...
Mon Jun 13 11:46:31 BST 2005
That's all wrong!
Ever tried playing anything in G flat? As a key signature it is somewhere
you only get by transposition during a piece from, er, er, well another key
anyway.
C, D, E, F, G, A and B are fine
C# and D flat - either way 7#s or 5 flats
E flat is fine D# messy 3 flats and loads of sharps
F# fine G flat very messy 6 sharps and ...
A flat is fine G# is messy 4 flats and 7 sharps
B flat is fine A# is messy 2 flats and lots of sharps
Well in my opinion anyway. Musicians would in general try to put the key in
the fewest accidentals and where we have a fixed pitch instrument that
doesn't change key, stick with what is simplest.
It might be that the note of the tenor was considered out of context in
which case G flat is still odd.
I have always categorised a note from -50 cents through to +50 cents by the
same name, in this case F#. Sorry, Dickon, but changing half way through
doesn't work for me!
Andrew
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dickon Love" <dickon.love at ...>
To: <bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 11:10 AM
Subject: [Bell Historians] Pitches of bells
> Apologies for returning to the old subject of when F sharp is or
> isn't G flat. I notice that Brasted bells went into the Whitechapel
> Bell Foundry quoted as F sharp and returned quoted as G flat. (I
> don't yet know the tenor nominal.)
>
> Having thought about this for a while, I am going to be implementing
> the following convention for my websites on Kent, London and
> Westminster:
>
> Anything between F and F+50 will be classed as F.
> Anything between F+50 and F# will be classed as F#.
> Anything between F# and F#+50 will be classed as Gb.
> Anything between F#+50 and G will be classed as G.
> I will not be using the notes B#, E#, Fb or Cb in my nomenclature,
> nor any double sharps or double flats.
>
> As for any notes on the cusp, hmmm, I'll take into account the rest
> of the scale.
>
> DrL
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list