[Bell Historians] Re: Taylors - Eayre & Smith merger
peter.c.kirby at ...
Tue May 17 11:43:59 BST 2005
Not a lot, but I suggest you check your Contract of Employment!!!
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Andrew Higson
Sent: 17 May 2005 11:37
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Re: Taylors - Eayre & Smith merger
I've been away in Oz for a month, hope you didn't miss me!
Anything happen while I was away?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Offen" <richard at ...>
To: <bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 11:18 AM
Subject: [Bell Historians] Re: Taylors - Eayre & Smith merger
> --- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "Mike Chester" <mike at m...> wrote:
>> When push comes to shove, we have no real influence on what happens
>> with the merger. It has seemed likely to me for a while that there
>> were too many companies bidding for the available work and therefore
>> there may well be many positives from this merger.
>> As with any company, if you are placing an order of the magnitude of
>> major rehang/augmentation you should research what you want, find out
>> which of the companies will supply you with exactly that and make a
>> decision based upon their replies. From the article in The Ringing
>> World, this seems to be what Wokingham did and, perhaps, this is an
>> example it would be worth following.
> I entirely agree. I has seemed to me for quite some time that the
> proliferation of bell hanging firms in recent years was not sustainable.
> In addition to careful research before engaging a company, far too few
> churches actually call the bell hangers back to put right niggling
> little faults after a ring has been installed.
> The classic example of this, only a few years ago, was the place where
> a ring had been rehung with a new frame and fittings. The then
> Diocesan Advisor (he'll know to whom I'm referring!) was invited to
> ring the fourth in the dedicatory rounds and found it to go like the
> side of a house. After the service, he mentioned this to the Tower
> Captain who replied, "Oh, it always used to go badly before we had `em
> done!" Most people wouldn't dream of accepting good from a high
> street retailer that were defective, so why do they consider that a
> newly restored ring of bells is any different?
> In my experience most of the bell hanging firms are pretty good at
> coming to rectify faults (some you have to battle with on occasions!),
> as it is in their interests to ensure that a job is as good as possible.
> Yahoo! Groups Links
Yahoo! Groups Links
More information about the Bell-historians