[Bell Historians] Re: Long Lengths

Andrew Higson andrew_higson at ...
Mon Oct 31 11:22:00 GMT 2005

Thanks for everybody's replies. I don't know about the ringers, but I
was relieved when they finished. Although the bells go for dozens of
peals without being checked, the thought of something falling off after
that amount of time is a bit stressful!

We've already had another request for a long length! However, in the
mean time, Brian Warwick's band are "performing" again this morning. :-(


-----Original Message-----
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Offen
Sent: 30 October 2005 10:17
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Bell Historians] Re: Long Lengths

--- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "home" <home at a...> wrote:
> Due to space restrictions and the number of new record length peals
> in recent years, the diary no longer contains all current records.

I know this list is probably not the forum for discussing this but, if 
the list in the Diary is incomplete nowadays, what's the point of 
having it at all?


Yahoo! Groups Links


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list