[Bell Historians] Re: Long Lengths

[Andrew Higson]

Thanks for everybody's replies. I don't know about the ringers, but I
was relieved when they finished. Although the bells go for dozens of
peals without being checked, the thought of something falling off after
that amount of time is a bit stressful!

We've already had another request for a long length! However, in the
mean time, Brian Warwick's band are "performing" again this morning. :-(

Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Offen
Sent: 30 October 2005 10:17
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Bell Historians] Re: Long Lengths


--- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "home" <home at a...> wrote:
>
> Due to space restrictions and the number of new record length peals
rung
> in recent years, the diary no longer contains all current records.
> 

I know this list is probably not the forum for discussing this but, if 
the list in the Diary is incomplete nowadays, what's the point of 
having it at all?

R







Yahoo! Groups Links