[Bell Historians] Re: National Bell Database
davidbryant at ...
Wed Sep 28 09:14:24 BST 2005
>Could have been worse, David. I could have called you what two people on
>this list called you in the pub last night (and several subscribers to this
>list did in private emails to me), but I am far too polite for that.
Of course, you're a model of politeness Mark.
>I think that constant rants about branch secretaries who wouldn't know a
>bell if it dropped on their foot, and demeaning someone's good intentions
>with using John Camp's wiki, are filling up inboxes quite happily on their
It wasn't a 'rant', and it wasn't directed at anyone specifically. I think
most people would agree that the majority of Branch Secretaries do not have
the required experience to be able to supply the sort of data which would be
required. I note that apart from you nobody has argued with this. That is
not to say that there are not Branch Secretaries who could contribute, and I
never said this. I merely said that the majority could not.
p.s. you are now moderated.
More information about the Bell-historians