[Bell Historians] Re: New 10s in "virgin" towers

Andrew Higson andrew_higson at b8nttkIjz-zAW85HbBANF1Eb-_iFcpv1jwvsul3uGsvJZ-NhDbLEzKJm_6WE3TRzLKx7iGA0CjSu6GZDs-ZnwSogyW_SmTWx.yahoo.invalid
Mon Feb 27 10:14:18 GMT 2006

Best bell in the peal ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Chester
Sent: 27 February 2006 10:11
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Bell Historians] Re: New 10s in "virgin" towers

--- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "Michael Wilby" <michael at ...> 
> During the open day at St Paul's Birmingham yesterday, the question
> asked: "where was the last tower without a ring of bells which had a
> installed?".

Knottingley previously had one bell that is now in the ring of 10.  
Roker went from an empty tower to a 10 in 1947.  



Yahoo! Groups Links



More information about the Bell-historians mailing list