[Bell Historians] Re: New 10s in 'virgin' towers

Andrew Higson andrew_higson at 4_w9ZswOpaUJjtUfO_PnUL-5nqmZT3DzbT6D-1-sGLtmnRzvqvcG_7o1WZ-C_ga0DwO7fX0ARLzuVbFikJU-ewttCRXpAkM8.yahoo.invalid
Mon Feb 27 11:55:42 GMT 2006

But do you know where it ended up?

-----Original Message-----
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Chester
Sent: 27 February 2006 11:52
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Bell Historians] Re: New 10s in 'virgin' towers

Just checked in the obvious place!  Douglas had a single bell by 
Taylors 6-2-4, cast in 1958, that became the 6th of 10.  It was not 
considered a good match even though the other 9 were also be Taylors 
and this bell was replaced in 2001 when the trebles were added.


Yahoo! Groups Links



More information about the Bell-historians mailing list