[Bell Historians] Re: Douglas former 4/10

David Bryant davidbryant at gdBBR8HVoV_KjP7Uv3zsyMQqJwNC28dk3jpcYdPF6RQVvHopjs0iAHLAJd8kpnFkaNP-hg5ey9NhLWqf29SCzMfDZ9U.yahoo.invalid
Mon Feb 27 23:21:26 GMT 2006

Previous message (by thread): [Bell Historians] Re: Douglas former 4/10
Next message (by thread): [Bell Historians] Re: New 10s in 'virgin' towers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I'm pretty sure it was 6/10

Yes - you're right.

David           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20060227/e0b97aa7/attachment.html>

Previous message (by thread): [Bell Historians] Re: Douglas former 4/10
Next message (by thread): [Bell Historians] Re: New 10s in 'virgin' towers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list