[Bell Historians] Wisbech

[HENRY TAYSOM]

 --- Susan & Christopher Dalton
<dalton.family at lxfPLzqrlKvINzAZeKe9Pg3sYy_GrKEC_fPuXHcUKmlEaQuacbl7CNz0nzmF9WFvcgCZsq92BYXFWAB1O5cCI0fgFQ.yahoo.invalid> wrote: 
> 
> 
> >From: "nigelsdtaylor"
> <nigeltaylor at wIzhFLvK0hDHKYuGzzz8iltX9lzjrjYzLglNHQoh765J-t9rLT1p3U0zfCGO6mPKhczfLt3mPvqPHQIzRxFtktMiQI0sts4wUQpnAWY.yahoo.invalid>
> >To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
> >Subject: [Bell Historians] Wisbech
> >Date: Thu, Jun 15, 2006, 8:37 pm
> >
> > I may be incorrect, but I thought that the tenor
> was also machined in
> > the shoulder, although the 2nd partial was left a
> shade sharp. Andrew
> > Higson presumably did some more shoulder cutting?
> I shall check the
> > tuning book when I have a spare moment.
> > Nigel Taylor
> 
> That should reveal all, and I am very ready to be
> corrected by the experts.
> 
> What Nigel calls the '2nd partial' (particularly
> affected by cutting in the
> shoulder) I take to be what the rest of us usually
> call the 'fundamental' or
> 'prime' and Whitechapel at that time called the
> 'extra'.
> 
> C D
>