Groton, Massachusetts USA
jimhedgcock
jameshedgcock at FMpL1N3qs_ULifNWp-gsflmtRrea_fdBouHObhvZunUuNf2jygOk3wk7qk95ZXZuXSThkuiPoSXtFfTJ8TdZrslM.yahoo.invalid
Mon May 22 16:03:43 BST 2006
--- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "Richard Offen" <richard at ...>
wrote:
>
>
> > The tenor of the old eight was given in Dove as 22 0 17.
> > The gross weight on the new tenor as written on the bell is 22 0
> 5.
> > The net weight written on it is 21 1 21, There are also some
> > dimensions on it ?' 11" x 3' 11"x 4' 8". ? = figure on my
> photograph
> > obscured by frame. All the others have similar details. 6th has
> M&S
> > GROTON via BOSTON No.6 GROSS 8 3 27, NETT 8 2 14, MEAS 2'
11"
> x 2'
> > 11" x 3' 6" ( last figure difficult to read from photo.) Frame
all
> > marked up M&S Groton via Boston. Until my recent revisit to
> Washington
> > Cathedral I had always considered Groton to be the best sounding
> ringin
> > peal in North America. Washington sounded very much improved from
> my
> > previous visit - but then I could be mistaken, as no doubt,
> somebody
> > would rush to point out.
>
>
> Certainly sounds like shipping weights to me!
>
> Both Groton and Washington Cathedral are superb sounding rings (for
> ringability, I still think the Cathedral tenor is the most well-
> mannered 32 cwt of bell in the world!) - not aware that anything
has
> been done to the acoustics in Washington, so perhaps you just had
> less wax in your ears last time you visited!
>
> R
>
As expected -with puerile comments.
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list