[Bell Historians] Gloucester

[David Bryant]

"But we are told that the inscription is 'Celis Nomen Gabrielis'. So why
should we assume a different original? (And why is 'nomen' needed
twice?)."

I've just checked in Bliss & Sharpe, and the Latin part of the inscription
(which is impressed and reversed - a botched facsimile) is 'Missi De Celis
Habeo Nomen Garielis'.

Just goes to prove that it isn't advisable the rely on any bell information
given by the media without checking it first!

David

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.4.0/760 - Release Date: 13/04/2007
20:04