[Bell Historians] Alnwick

Peter Rivet peter at AgdHU20B-vnxkd5nokHBajqb7ngMsmMsLzI0_zqro09WGkQ_SU_SoTmg3pCHhqPAuBamZO_4gQnk7W_D.yahoo.invalid
Thu Apr 26 17:22:34 BST 2007

No... but Canon Mulvaney indicated that the bells should be rehung - and lo!
they were rehung (once the money was available).  There didn't seem to be
any question of waiting for approval.


  -----Original Message-----
  From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
[mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of George Dawson
  Sent: 25 April 2007 18:28
  To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Bell Historians] Alnwick

     it is much more a matter of obtaining instructions from the competent
authority than the faculty procedure used by the C of E.

    Peter Rivet

    Does this mean that Rome gave permission?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20070426/cffc96bc/attachment.html>

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list