[Bell Historians] Bells Stolen

Neil Skelton neil.tcct at vLQ0yt652pRvEWhQvtk2grI0gcf2XM9WPN9yMxnPswOVKCTIUxFEu6bG6Qq-O3TOKUtnCdNzWG9F3Q.yahoo.invalid
Fri Aug 17 15:42:15 BST 2007

steelery surely, or should that be stealery?

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: George Dawson 
  To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 8:48 AM
  Subject: [Bell Historians] Bells Stolen

  & I thought irony only applied to Naylor Vickers bells, for the rest it is bronzery surely.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Pickford
    Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 8:26 AM
    To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
    Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Bells Stolen - Merton, Devon

    David Bryant "You'd better be careful! I was told off recently for expressing my opinions ..."

    Maybe, but you missed the irony. I've done a lot of research on Warners - and actually much prefer their meatier rings of the 1870s to early 1890s to those of other founders of the period - and my slightly derogatory remark about their work was only intended to amuse those who are aware of my now rather extensive knowledge of the firm and its work


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20070817/6067e8c5/attachment.html>

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list