[Bell Historians] Steelwork into masonary
Anne Willis
zen16073 at JPDGzjZHVL38UEIRL-d3FDwLSB-wEZ4GSIafNQCXG-HGGvloaYCOtEpjmLKsEK0LyyarzqOCLpxZeX1r.yahoo.invalid
Sat Feb 24 15:53:09 GMT 2007
_____
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of Chris Povey
Sent: 23 February 2007 21:36
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Steelwork into masonary
Isn't it about time that the Central Council Towers and Belfries Committee
(perhaps with the backing of EH, SPAB etc) produced some guidelines for
Church Architects with regard to this??? If they did - perhaps cases like
Kings Lynn and Kelveden would never have happened.
Matthew Higby, 23/2/07
Matthew: since you told me last year about the difficulties you'd
experienced at Marshfield (and also from a telephone conversation I'd had
previously with the tower captain at Kings Lynn), I've tried to obtain a
written 'official' ruling about what should be used to build-in steel beam
ends, particularly as a verbal view had been expressed somewhat widely
previously. I took precisely the same view about this then as you are taking
now. In fact, the subject was discussed at last Saturday's Towers & Belfries
Committee meeting.
Chris Povey
Could every DAC bells representative should have a copy?
Anne
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20070224/198de0f5/attachment.html>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list