[Bell Historians] Re: FW: a neglected tower

David Cawley dave at -34i72tvtQRtRbq11_gSCMUjbh2RL7aKymX581QQYOXOw6tYoEMRlbQcNaws1S0KLXeNpzZDKCx2r5HrERylzFcRkA.yahoo.invalid
Tue Feb 27 22:11:36 GMT 2007


THANK GOODNESS SOMEONE HAS GOT IN (THOUGH HOW DID THEY MANAGE IT?) AND RAISED THE QUESTION OF THIS EXCELLENT RING OF TEN. 

THE PRESENT SITUATION IS A DISGRACE TO THE PARISH, THE DIOCESE, THE LOCAL RINGING ASSOCIATION AND TO THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND.

MAY THESE BELLS NOW BE REGARDED AS SERIOUSLY AT RISK? DOES NOBODY WITH ANY SAY IN THE MATTER CARE? AND IF NOT, WHAT CAN THE EXERCISE DO ABOUT IT?

I WISH I KNEW. 

DLC

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: David Bryant 
  To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 9:30 PM
  Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Re: FW: a neglected tower


  > Why on earth are the bells still in there?

  Rumour has it that it is due to local politics - perhaps someone in the area
  knows more? I recall David Potter telling me that he tried to buy the bells
  but they wouldn't sell them.

  David 



              
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20070227/50cd87dc/attachment.html>


More information about the Bell-historians mailing list