[Bell Historians] Re: FW: a neglected tower

[jimhedgcock]

--- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "David Cawley" <dave at ...> wrote:
>
> THANK GOODNESS SOMEONE HAS GOT IN (THOUGH HOW DID THEY MANAGE IT?) 
AND RAISED THE QUESTION OF THIS EXCELLENT RING OF TEN. 
> 
>Quality of tone is very much subjective.
Like other founders, G&J produced good, mediocre and poor bells. Some 
of their rings had short lives. I don't remember Hanley being discussed 
in any flattering terms, like some of their work.