[Bell Historians] King's Lynn
davidhird_uk
davidhird_uk at ktezvZSrvfCcMAtl6YOJt0H_FbPFvsywlYtYssZthebqyafiOstIzFOSAzX23OaJLxUBFyiZKzmSk789RdU29Q.yahoo.invalid
Wed Jul 4 12:54:18 BST 2007
Is it the same type of frame? T,E&S haven't been hanging since the
1890s. Neither has E&S. Only Taylor's have been hanging since then.
Is the frame to a normal historical Taylor spec or is there now some
sort of hybrid design possibly incorporating C channels instead of
RSJs for example.
David
--- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, David Bryant
<davidbryant at ...> wrote:
>
> Interesting - particularly the quote from the vicar:
>
> "Vicar the Rev Chris Ivory claims some blame lies with the
bellfounders due to the type of frame used, but he concedes there is
an issue with the grout mix."
>
> It would be interesting to know on what grounds he is claiming
there is a problem with the type of frame, given that this type of
frame has been used without problems in literally hundreds of towers
since the mid-1890s. Is he claiming that he knows better than the
bellfounders?
> David
>
>
> To: bellhistorians at ...: editor at ...: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:10:58
+0100Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] King's Lynn
>
>
>
>
> See:http://www.lynnnews.co.uk:80/news?articleid=2999296RAL
>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list