[Bell Historians] Fen Ditton

[Bickerton, Roderic K (SELEX) (UK)]

I rang Fen shortly after they went in.
Things can change appreciably as clappers bed in.
To recount a tail, I remembered Haywood as being possibly the nicest, beautifully mellow 8 I had heard. We were almost the first to ring on new clappers, 1973. I went back a few years ago and found them really disappointing, distinctly over bright and harsh.
Is that what has happened at Fen? I really must go back.

________________________________

From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Sue Marsden
Sent: 02 May 2007 15:42
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Fen Ditton


*** WARNING ***

This mail has originated outside your organization,
either from an external partner or the Global Internet. 
Keep this in mind if you answer this message. 
	

On 02/05/07, Dickon Love <dickon at U_MYKSFDp_qjy_JYkOJ_m7lX2SZ4IoVMl7SIAn8hdRC3JxCIJV4MnpAbc4Z8fVPN3whLaS0Tcadn3g.yahoo.invalid <mailto:dickon%40ascy.org.uk> > wrote:

> PS. I am with Sue Marsden on her judgment of the quality of the present Fen Ditton bells. I have rung a number of peals on them, and they are 'ok' but nothing more.

They should have been a lot better than 'OK' which is a shame. But
they are a lot better than many of the rings of 8 nearby - Histon,
Huntingdon, Littleport, etc, etc.
SEM


 

SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems Limited
Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 3EL
A company registered in England & Wales.  Company no. 02426132
********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************