St Paul's and Chelsea
davidhird_uk
davidhird_uk at Koad25SO3Yx1Sb89gRedr9LKIbgH582vrje55iXR4XhDtag3rmSH4Arrtoa32SIgXNlxrIcXM1AZJb3czMhY.yahoo.invalid
Mon Oct 1 09:05:21 BST 2007
So what do you actually want to do at St Lukes?
Sounds like it is a case for hanging the current bells for chiming
high in the tower to satisfy the conservationists and hanging a new
10 lower down the tower. Wish they had done that at Durham.
Are the bells actually too heavy or are they just hung too high up
in a frame which doesnt resolve the forces as well as it could?
David
--- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, <alantaylor at ...> wrote:
>
> I am extremely glad that they are the only complete pre-tune
harmonic 12 to
> survive. I am also thankful that they are unique.
>
>
>
> If you think they should be listed and preserved, I would suggest
that they
> be put on display in the church yard. Then hang a musical peal of
bells in
> the tower. Just imagine a sound such as the bells of York Minster
sounding
> from the tower. I can't imagine that the St Paul's ringers would
mind. As
> long as the tenor is heavy they would be happy.
>
>
>
> We have the same problem with the bells of St Luke's Chelsea. They
sound
> dreadful; they are too heavy for the tower and therefore go badly.
But we
> are told they should be preserved as they are historically
interesting as a
> Thomas Mears 2nd peal of ten. I wonder why Thomas Mears 2nd bells
are
> getting rare. Although the last report from The Council for the
Care of
> Churches, said they felt the bells should be preserved as a peal
of TM2nd
> ten bells. But, as the trebles were so awful, new bells could be
cast and
> hung in their place. But the old trebles should be hung dead in
the tower.
> This breathtaking logic seems to miss the point, that with new
trebles, the
> ring would no longer be a TM2 ten. And, the bells would still be
too heavy
> for the tower, and therefore the tower would still sway and this
would
> therefore make the bells tricky to ring. St Luke's is to go to the
expense
> of a consistory court.
>
>
>
> There is often the same debate over pipe organs. It doesn't matter
what it
> sounds like, or if it is capable of accompanying a congregation or
choir,
> it's old and therefore should be preserved.
>
>
>
> Alan
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list