[Bell Historians] Spot the mistake

Peter Kirby peter.c.kirby at 7bJmi8fWKtlWwS3_bqsOZWtgbr1ip5nuU0n7Mn2FU-PUI6NQCD1GOnTSCIz7Je-80fvoSBBWS4tvEp1p2_VON1mUsHL8oQQ.yahoo.invalid
Mon Sep 3 22:51:09 BST 2007

The Whitechapel bell of 2005 (the one in the octagonal picture) purporting
to be for Orton-on-the-Hill?  Very few Whitechapel bells in the Diocese of
Leicester and none bearing that date 


-----Original Message-----
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of David Bryant
Sent: 03 September 2007 21:45
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Bell Historians] Spot the mistake


I’ve been looking at web pages on bells, as you do, and came across this
one: http://www.sheepych


There is an obvious mistake here - does anyone know what the explanation is?
(I’ll let you work out what it is – anyone claiming to be a bell historian
should be able to spot it easily enough!)




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20070903/6f1ce907/attachment.html>

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list