[Bell Historians] Nominal or hum
Carl S Zimmerman
csz_stl at 0Ar02isWfbit21u9t80VSnpbBVV3k3VVIqaQsYEj-m6ROOrYO0Khna0GGOONhbYw73wYYk3NbjTst5lbjQ.yahoo.invalid
Tue Apr 15 17:04:42 BST 2008
The arguments for both methods of measuring/recording the pitch of
bells certainly have merit. But I cannot see any merit in switching
methods in mid-instrument, especially since Bill Hibbert's work shows
that the perceptual transition point is likely to be different for
different people.
Pick one system to use for all the bells in the instrument, and live
with the fact that it may not be optimal for the entire range.
--
Carl Scott Zimmerman, Campanologist
Avocation: tower bells: www.gcna.org (Webmaster)
Recreation: handbells: www.gatewayringers.org
Mission: church bells: www.TowerBells.org (Webmaster)
Voicemail: +1-314-821-8437 (home) E-mail: csz_stl at 1-VNhLYE1XGLD86zkGO8vvrsWFz8gPGWl6yznBAT_7Q2WOiWr4TAFN6aC-ObkxC5ADpnZBFrvY221LAUqA.yahoo.invalid
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA - 19th c. home of at least 34 bell
. . . . . . . . . . . foundries or resellers
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list