[Bell Historians] Ludlow
Andrew Bull
a_m_bull at XlwpdtKhhvQEHrI-mWbo_mxWu4umPV_ggCeRLXLBnStfbKRZFc5ChsXnZpmyl7jSOj7c4ih4b-_ZYg.yahoo.invalid
Sun Dec 28 19:05:44 GMT 2008
The previous tenor was by Thomas Mears II, 1832, weight 22-3-0 after
retuning and removal of canons in 1890. The bells were indeed a complete
Rudhall octave of 1732, the original tenor weighing 25-1-11.
Andrew
_____
From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of David Bryant
Sent: 28 December 2008 18:12
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Bell Historians] Ludlow
"When the bells were rehung in 1988, the existing frame was retained, but
the old tenor was found to be a poor and porous casting, and was recast over
two hundredweight heavier"
Do you know who it was by? Was it a Rudhall bell? Presumably they started
out as a complete octave.
David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20081228/c468fa4d/attachment.html>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list