[Bell Historians] More bells?
davidhird_uk
davidhird_uk at SZVO0MOgKDPf0OXKNiDnurGh4IWrzvgVeFVYcUXsYP_Sz1Bf-U1B6eDbZR8cuhxTHwT4zFqKEp9ytIcJBPWb9tRp.yahoo.invalid
Fri Feb 15 18:21:47 GMT 2008
The opposite happened at Stockton when they went to 12. The band
shrank dramatically.
At Newcastle we added a sharp treble to give a light 10 as an ageing
band meant we also struggled sometimes to ring the back 10 or 8. The
norm now is to ring the light 10 an a Sunday morning and the 12 or
back 10 for evensong due to the different age profiles of our morning
and evening bands.
David
--- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "Martin Davies"
<martindavies at ...> wrote:
>
> >>I'm sure you are right that prestige has a lot to do with
> augmentations to twelve. I too am sceptical about how many twelves
> have Sunday service bands that actually ring changes on twelve
> regularly.<<
>
> Hope this is still classified as Bell History.......
>
> As we are on the brink of a 10 to 12(+1) augmentation at Ripon I
> thought our reasons for doing this may be useful. Our band isn't
> particulaly competent at ringing changes on 10 (we are a Plain Bob
9/
> Stedman 7 type of band) but good quality call changes on 10 are the
> norm on sunday. We have over 20 members, many of them youngsters or
> learners. The main reasons for going ahead with our augmentation
are:
>
> 1) The installation is more flexible for teaching purposes. The
light
> 8 will make a huge difference to our band especially in progressing
> from 6 bell to 8 bell ringing
> 2) In holiday periods we often meet with plenty of ringers but not
> enough back bells ringers, again the light 8 will be very useful
> 3) We have the numbers and the band should be able to deliver good
> quality call changes on 12 for sunday service from the outset
> 4) We considered an augmentation by 2 addition bells as at Grantham
> or Writtle to give us the light 8 and maintain the 10 intact. We
> decided 12 represented a better long term view.
> 5) Other changes to the installation (such as rope guides,twiddle
> pins) are included in the project to make the bells easier to ring.
> This will help exisiting ringers progress more rapidly and increase
> retention of new ringers
> 6) To include ringing room refurbishment in the augmentation plans -
> obvious benefits and provided an added motivation to all the
ringers
> to become involved and support the project
> 7) It was clear from the enthusiasm and pledges generated when the
> project was initially discussed that the project fundraising would
> come to a successful conlusion. There was a real "now or never"
> mentality
> 8) There is no doubt that a 12 bell facility in our area will be
well
> used
> 9) The long term vision is to establish 12 bell change ringing at
> Ripon. This will never happen without an augmentation
>
> In terms of funding the Flat 6th has paid for itself many times
over.
> It has allowed us to put out a considered message about "training
and
> retention of ringers" to the funding bodies which has produced good
> results.
>
> And I agree fully with Marks comments about new bells producing new
> ringers. The past 3 years of fundraising has pulled the band
together
> and we have increased in numbers from 12 to over 20. Some of the
new
> ringers have moved to the area ,some we have taught, and one has
> returned to ringing. Retention figure are much higher than before
and
> I am convinced this is a direct result of the augmentation plans.
>
> Martin
>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list