[Bell Historians] Re: Cornhill

David Cawley dave at 1acuZwyl8xINUhTxOr_ufiQ4Coud9DIYGtPqxrnUI5wzsGOcTCCnY2x-4NbAkacQF2Xx939S_dxBRoVjF8-6wGra9n6W.yahoo.invalid
Sat Jan 5 13:03:09 GMT 2008

Well said, Richard.

If chapter and verse are required then this site is not the place to discuss it. The correct approach is to the Tower Master and Secretary, Tony Kench.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Richard Offen 
  To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 11:07 AM
  Subject: [Bell Historians] Re: Cornhill

  --- In bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com, "jimhedgcock" 
  <jameshedgcock at ...> wrote:
  > Who has raised, and what are the objections to the replacement ring 
  > Cornhill?

  As the matter is still before the Chancellor of the Diocese, I would 
  imagine that information is confidential at present. Whilst it would 
  probably be of some interest to know what the objections are, who has 
  made them is really none of our business!


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20080105/42315949/attachment.html>

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list