Alan Buswell's "new survey" (RW, page 541)
Nick Bowden
nickwbowden at ew_GPWTuqcyuZhjA1n3dKGEkCmX7egE5ARyKCTcVyatQQ3b03CSPAGgNXaqN42lXHCghMUyUbzsJ60gBLw.yahoo.invalid
Fri May 16 12:33:53 BST 2008
Nick Bowden writes:
Last sentence should have read - I wonder if they will ever RING out
again.....
> John Baldwin writes:
>
>> I have just sent Alan what I hope is the raw data for the new survey
>> he proposes at the end of the article; it is appended below.
>>
>> Please let me (and Alan) know if I have mis-classified any of them
>> (ie, are there any missing, is there an entry which should not be there?)
>>
>> 2005 8 Baldersby /
>
> There's bound to be some comment about Baldersby, which of course, are not a
> new ring, but reclassified as a ring since the last edition of Dove. I
> wonder if they will ever out again.....
> Nick
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list