Alan Buswell's "new survey" (RW, page 541)

Nick Bowden nickwbowden at ew_GPWTuqcyuZhjA1n3dKGEkCmX7egE5ARyKCTcVyatQQ3b03CSPAGgNXaqN42lXHCghMUyUbzsJ60gBLw.yahoo.invalid
Fri May 16 12:33:53 BST 2008


Nick Bowden writes:
Last sentence should have read - I wonder if they will ever RING out 
again..... 

> John Baldwin writes:  
> 
>> I have just sent Alan what I hope is the raw data for the new survey
>> he proposes at the end of the article; it is appended below.    
>> 
>> Please let me (and Alan) know if I have mis-classified any of them
>> (ie, are there any missing, is there an entry which should not be there?)  
>> 
>> 2005  8 Baldersby                          /     
> 
> There's bound to be some comment about Baldersby, which of course, are not a 
> new ring, but reclassified as a ring since the last edition of Dove. I 
> wonder if they will ever out again.....
> Nick

           



More information about the Bell-historians mailing list