[Bell Historians] Re: Alan Buswell's "new survey" (RW, page 541)

David Bryant davidbryant at 6ONYRnmU0DMLl9Tyqxx7o0nd05e9F_cLXNaHpWQI4aRTrB6nK2OaKOowsY6S0kZGUzkXDhfGz7zVw1nicvjzDg.yahoo.invalid
Fri May 16 12:30:31 BST 2008

"There's bound to be some comment about Baldersby, which of course, are not a new ring, but reclassified as a ring since the last edition of Dove. I wonder if they will ever out again....."
Baldersby aren't new, and quite a few of the others in the list are augmentations from 3, which I wouldn't classify as new rings.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20080516/2647d952/attachment.html>

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list