[Bell Historians] Re: Alan Buswell's "new survey" (RW, page 541)
Alan Buswell
aaj.buswell at RFTFZnopnrtVFMVny-FMbK04JoWKDNfCS_xxWm26oymbWFdzqjcFph7EoxXMfB3ra_GOhZqfdIuj43Fn-HrRtI0.yahoo.invalid
Fri May 16 20:35:50 BST 2008
But these towers are now accountable for quarter peals - my form of jugdement.
Alan B
----- Original Message -----
From: David Bryant
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2008 12:30 PM
Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Re: Alan Buswell's "new survey" (RW, page 541)
"There's bound to be some comment about Baldersby, which of course, are not a
new ring, but reclassified as a ring since the last edition of Dove. I
wonder if they will ever out again....."
Baldersby aren't new, and quite a few of the others in the list are augmentations from 3, which I wouldn't classify as new rings.
David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20080516/ff8786e4/attachment.html>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list