[Bell Historians] Re: Alan Buswell's "new survey" (RW, page 541)

David Bryant davidbryant at JjELyHHohhs6XfHb_ueDTgTVBrqqm9DQtgMaZn_dpuBIrOADK9v_OmYZqNLXPaPmU2trHDdj4RsJTrKarXzp-Yw.yahoo.invalid
Fri May 16 20:41:02 BST 2008

"But these towers are now accountable for quarter peals - my form of


So what's wrong with quarters on 3? I've rung a lot, and as there are no
rules for quarters there's nothing to say that they are any less valid than
quarters on any other number.



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1446 - Release Date: 16/05/2008

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20080516/a1d08db6/attachment.html>

More information about the Bell-historians mailing list