Ball bearings on plain
George Dawson
george at rcGAEfFf1-999X18Q5LYGSI5KjqstHmwwdVvZlGf3IS72qWxUmI60FnDcVytx_aNpCcJ4Yqryc_NA2hyfpfV8hMqC36JyA.yahoo.invalid
Thu May 22 16:51:19 BST 2008
Ah, an explanation that makes sense.
Thanks
George
I'm not a current engineer (or really a current anything!) but I think
the argument was that gudgeons running on plain bearings are (usually)
supported much closer to the point of exit from the headstock - probably
within half an inch or less, whereas the point of support in a ball
bearing, not always obvious from the outside of the housing, can be an
inch or even more, increasing the bending moment considerably.
Steve
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list