[Bell Historians] Glastonbury, St. John the Baptist
Douglas Davis
dougdavis22 at jPhGXlYSve-T8gF-gVL7Qpeh-1g3cQ-Z8A6HM1wRCpUrYPIU27eE2AIroPUydvFya5Y17ZMFgyvRE4EPw8oeDQ_o.yahoo.invalid
Mon May 26 11:45:48 BST 2008
Many thanks David, much appreciated.
Doug.
On 26/05/2008, David Bryant <davidbryant at D6b6d5zYNVIbieW86qdeFejpO8M6FvCIIp_8oPX6xgXpnAF9lMhA3yfavNqiMM7wQIc7fWj3XY_vK7rP-tHjK6JKVfg.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
>
> They were remodelled. 1,2 and 6 were new, 3,4,5 were the old 1,2,3, 7
> was the old 6 and the tenor was the old tenor from St Saviour's, Bath. The
> old Glastonbury tenor went to Australia, and so far as I know the other
> redundant Glastonbury bells (4, 5, 7) were scrapped.
>
>
>
> David
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:
> bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Douglas Davis
> *Sent:* 26 May 2008 10:00
> *To:* bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* [Bell Historians] Glastonbury, St. John the Baptist
>
>
>
> I wonder if anyone can just confirm something for me.
>
>
>
> I'm going through my old ringing records, and when I rung at Glastonbury
> St. John back in 1991 I had the tenor listed as 26cwt. I now see that the
> tenor is only 14cwt, but the treble and 2nd were recast in 1992. Has the
> tenor been replaced, or have they always been 14cwt and I've just got the
> details incorrect in my records?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Doug.
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 269.24.1/1466 - Release Date: 25/05/2008
> 18:49
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20080526/9f8e077e/attachment.html>
More information about the Bell-historians
mailing list