[Bell Historians] Ludlow

[Andrew Higson]

The latter.

 

Andrew Higson

Taylors Eayre and Smith Ltd

The Bellfoundry

Freehold Street

Loughborough

LE11 1AR

Telephone: 01509 212241 Fax: 01509 263305 Registered in England No. 1352309

________________________________

From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Bull
Sent: 24 November 2008 10:52
To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Ludlow

 

Was this the retuning at Ludlow, or the retuning at Quedgeley?

 

Andrew Bull

Andrew Higson <andrew.higson at YGn7W1LXCTPz3eddpkXL5TkdNvCRhzRAe_xkctuv6VdZTzQz9b801ZvmONjcQw5799WuAIC4HNw1tJKhZzJgMZPYBxykdZmP.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

	They weren't overly sharp before I started. The incumbent was very grumpy about what I had done until the organist observed how pleasant and musical the bells were after the retune.

	Andrew Higson

	Taylors Eayre and Smith Ltd

	The Bellfoundry

	Freehold Street

	Loughborough

	LE11 1AR

	Telephone: 01509 212241 Fax: 01509 263305 Registered in England No. 1352309

	
________________________________


	From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at 8QWERtzIba-Dyr8gqNWTtAtkEmpFPtpsJIDFZ1O3tiVzBXufuvVwgiIgEWLUR9LPdQRfrZHGGIKsyQQm_l9acsAWWMME.yahoo.invalidm] On Behalf Of Richard Offen
	Sent: 23 November 2008 21:40
	To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
	Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Ludlow

	Did they really manage to get octave hum notes out of the Rudhall bells at Quedgley?

	R

	
	
________________________________


	From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at 8QWERtzIba-Dyr8gqNWTtAtkEmpFPtpsJIDFZ1O3tiVzBXufuvVwgiIgEWLUR9LPdQRfrZHGGIKsyQQm_l9acsAWWMME.yahoo.invalidm] On Behalf Of Andrew Bull
	Sent: Monday, 24 November 2008 12:55 AM
	To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
	Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Ludlow

	I imagine that the present 5th and treble will have to be recast, as they would need to be sharpened by a semitone to make 9th and 4th of ten with the present 7th as tenor. Presumably the others would be retuned as well, though I believe they were in fact retuned in 1988 (as well as 1890). It would be interesting to know who is doing the job, and whether the new bells will be old-style or true-harmonic. Quedgeley, in Gloucester, also largely Rudhall 1732, were retuned in 1993 and converted into a true-harmonic ring, which the exception of the 1850 Taylor sixth, which obviously caused the tuned some problems.

	Andrew Bull

	
	
________________________________


	From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at 8QWERtzIba-Dyr8gqNWTtAtkEmpFPtpsJIDFZ1O3tiVzBXufuvVwgiIgEWLUR9LPdQRfrZHGGIKsyQQm_l9acsAWWMME.yahoo.invalidm] On Behalf Of Richard Offen
	Sent: 23 November 2008 15:42
	To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
	Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Ludlow

	I hope they are going to be tuned, the present 6th is horribly flat (almost a ¼ semitone)!

	R

	
	
________________________________


	From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com [mailto:bellhistorians at 8QWERtzIba-Dyr8gqNWTtAtkEmpFPtpsJIDFZ1O3tiVzBXufuvVwgiIgEWLUR9LPdQRfrZHGGIKsyQQm_l9acsAWWMME.yahoo.invalidm] On Behalf Of Andrew Watkins
	Sent: Sunday, 23 November 2008 11:46 PM
	To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
	Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Ludlow

	
	Ludlow are going to be made into a 10, with the present 7th as the tenor. The bells are coming out on the 3rd December. Sorry I can't tell you much more at present.
	
	Andrew Watkins
	
	
	
	
	
	
	

		========================================
		Message Received: Nov 23 2008, 12:58 PM
		From: "Richard Offen" 
		To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com
		Cc: 
		Subject: RE: [Bell Historians] Ludlow
		
		
		
		
		
		
		

		I guess they are either going up to ten or twelve, as has been planned for
		the last five years or so - they have two of the Gillett bells from the old
		ring at Kidderminster in store.
		
		R
		
		-----Original Message-----
		From: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com <mailto:bellhistorians%40yahoogroups.com>  [mailto:bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com <mailto:bellhistorians%40yahoogroups.com> ]
		On Behalf Of David Bryaant
		Sent: Sunday, 23 November 2008 9:41 PM
		To: bellhistorians at yahoogroups.com <mailto:bellhistorians%40yahoogroups.com> 
		Subject: [Bell Historians] Ludlow
		
		What's happening at Ludlow, then?
		
		http://www.campanophile.co.uk/show.aspx?Code=74540 <http://www.campanophile.co.uk/show.aspx?Code=74540> 
		<http://www.campanophile.co.uk/show.aspx?Code=74540 <http://www.campanophile.co.uk/show.aspx?Code=74540> > 
		
		Is the augmentation to 12+2# proposed a few years ago now going ahead?
		
		David
		
		No virus found in this incoming message.
		Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/>  
		Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.9/1806 - Release Date: 11/22/2008
		6:59 PM

	No virus found in this incoming message.
	Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
	Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.9/1806 - Release Date: 11/22/2008 6:59 PM

	No virus found in this incoming message.
	Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
	Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.9/1808 - Release Date: 11/23/2008 6:59 PM

 

  

 

           
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ringingworld.co.uk/pipermail/bell-historians/attachments/20081124/6700f6a2/attachment.html>